Legal Opinion

Comer v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1933No. 9161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. The provision of the Civil Code (1910), § 2811, to the effect that any telegraph or telephone company, in the exercise of the power of eminent domain, shall have the right to construct, maintain, and operate telegraph or telephone lines, or both, where necessary “under or over” any private lands in this State, must, upon a consideration of the entire section, be construed as authorizing the company to construct, maintain, and operate its lines both under and over such lands, where necessary for the public use served by such company.

2. The word “or” as used in a statute should be construed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Dorsey v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Bettie v. Daniel Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Pittsburgh-Erie Saw Corp. v. Southern Saw Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1955
  3. Fennell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Rite Aid Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Rite Aid Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API