Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rite Aid Corp. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 2006No. A06A0682Published

1DissentBernes, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In contrast to the majority, I believe that we must interpret the “or” in former OCGA § 34-9-200.1 (g) (6) as a conjunctive “and” in order to avoid an absurd result under the Georgia workers’ compensation statutes.

Under OCGA§ 34-9-261, an employee who sustains a temporary total disability is entitled to weekly workers’ compensation benefits for a maximum of 400 weeks from the date of injury. But, this cap on weekly benefits does not apply to an employee who suffers a catastrophic injury as that term is defined in the former and current versions of OCGA § 34-9-200.1 (g)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Hawes v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. K Mart Corp. v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Cedartown Nursing Home v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API