Legal Opinion
In Re La Montagne
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 1, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2856-2861PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
Patent appeals Nos. 2856, 2857, 2858, 2859, 2860, and 2861 have, by stipulation of counsel, been jointly briefed and argued, and, inasmuch as the subject-matters of said appeals are largely the same, said appeals will be herein jointly disposed of.
The appellant in each case, Patrick P. La Montagne, on Junb 21, 1927, filed seven applications in the United States Patent Office for design patents upon what were claimed to he new, original, and ornamental designs for hosiery. One of these went to patent upon May 28, 1929, as Des. 78,636: The claims in the six remaining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashley v. Weeks-Numan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- R. E. Dietz Co. v. Burr & Starkweather Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- North British Rubber Co. v. Racine Rubber Tire Co. of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Protex Signal Co. v. FenigerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Boyle v. RoussoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- In Re BarberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Hopkins v. Waco Products, Inc. Alan's Sales Engineers v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Application of JabourCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.