Legal Opinion

Browne v. Loriaux

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1961No. 42,403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This action grew out of a dispute between joint owners of two producing oil leases as to the right to control the operation. The dispute ripened into a request for relief by way of partition. The plaintiff (Phoebe Harrington Browne) prevailed in the district court and defendants (Francine and Eva Loriaux) have appealed.

The allegations of the pleadings, highly summarized, are as follows;

Plaintiff in the first count of her petition alleges that she is the owner of a two-thirds working interest in two mineral leases on the Southwest Quarter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Deeds v. DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Manville v. GronnigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Browning v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. State v. ForenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casebeer v. CasebeerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Larson Operating Co. v. Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Home-Stake Production Co. v. Tri-State Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Murfin Drilling Co. v. PoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Klima Well Service, Inc. v. HurleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API