Legal Opinion

Larson Operating Co. v. Petroleum, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 20, 2004No. 89,949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

This appeal frames numerous issues among three parties (buyer, seller, and operator on behalf of those with preferential rights) after oil and gas leasehold interests that were purportedly subject to preferential rights to purchase were sold in breach of such rights. The district court concluded that the buyer was a bona fide purchaser entitled to dismissal from the suit and then awarded judgment for damages against seller to those with preferential rights. On this issue we reverse, concluding that the buyer was not a bona fide purchaser. We affirm the district court on issues of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Garten Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Wilson v. American Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Hochman v. American Family InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. Torkelson v. Bank of HortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Washington Mutual Bank FACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Curo Enterprises, LLC v. Dunes Residential Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. Hamilton v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (In Re Kunze)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  4. Klima Well Service, Inc. v. HurleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  5. Power Gas Marketing & Transmission, Inc. v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API