Doe v. Town of Plainfield
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
John Doe brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s grant of the Town of Plainfield’s (“Plainfield”) motion to reconsider an earlier order that had allowed Doe to proceed anonymously. Doe raises one issue, which we revise and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted Plainfield’s motion to reconsider and denied Doe’s re*1206quest to proceed anonymously. We reverse and remand.
The relevant facts follow. On or about November 25, 2002, Plainfield adopted Ordinance No. 16-2002, which establishes the rules and regulations for parks and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Femedeer v. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jane Doe v. Kristan P. ReibelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026