Legal Opinion

Reindl v. Opitz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1974No. 11272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff was awarded $36,000 by a jury in her action for personal injuries. Defendant appeals from the judgment, claiming that the verdict is excessive.

At approximately 1 a. m. on April 27, 1971, plaintiff’s automobile was struck from the rear by defendant’s automobile as plaintiff was stopped at an intersection in Rapid City, South Dakota. The force of the impact tore the front seat of plaintiff’s automobile loose from the floorboard and pushed the automobile diagonally across the intersection, over a concrete dividing island and up over the curb. *

Plaintiff was examined at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schuler v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ross v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Stene v. HillgrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Piper v. Barber Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Watkins v. EbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Weiland v. BumannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API