Stene v. Hillgren
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This action is for damages resulting from an assault and battery. The jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $938. In response to an application by defendant the trial court vacated the verdict and granted a new trial. The order was based upon the ground that the jury had awarded excessive damages under the influence of passion or prejudice. Cf. SDC 33.1605(5). Whether, in so doing, the trial court abused its discretion is the sole issue before us.
A building located in Sioux Falls, known as the Nordic Hall, is owned by a corporation and is managed by defendant Ralph 0. Hillgren. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Gamble v. KeyesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hulstein v. Meilman Food Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Ehlers v. Chrysler Motor CorporationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Plank v. HeirigsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Ross v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Simmons v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.