Dolvin Realty Company v. Holley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Headnotes 1 and la require no elaboration.
The law is uniform and well settled that an agent, who has been engaged to sell real estate for the owner, may not, either directly or indirectly, purchase it himself, without the express consent of the principal after a full knowledge of all the facts. This is so declared by our Code, § 4-204. The reason for this elementary principle of law is well stated by the author of Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence (5th ed.), § 959, as follows: “The underlying thought is that an agent should not unite his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Whitley v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Arthur v. Georgia Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Reed v. AubreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Ausley v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Fickling & Walker Co. v. Giddens Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Johnson Realty, Inc. v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Kline v. Pyms Suchman Real Estate CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Killearn Partners, Inc. v. Southeast Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.