Legal Opinion

State v. Albert

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2002No. 26828PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Michael Albert appeals from his conviction for statutory rape following a jury trial. He argues that the district court erred by excluding all of his alibi witnesses as a sanction for discovery violations and by denying Albert’s motion to compel the State to produce the name and telephone number of another adult with whom the alleged victim previously had sexual relations. Because we hold that the district court committed reversible error in excluding Albert’s alibi witnesses, we vacate the judgment of conviction and remand the case for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

Albert was indicted…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MeisterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. OgdenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. DiazIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. VondenkampIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API