Legal Opinion

In re Exterior Metal Siding Warranty Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 17, 2012No. MDL No. 2345Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1353ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants Gentek Building Products, Inc., and Associated Materials, LLC, move for centralization of this litigation in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. This litigation currently consists of seven actions pending in five districts, as listed on Schedule A. An additional related action is pending in the District of Minnesota.

All plaintiffs oppose centralization under Section 1407, arguing that voluntary coordination by the parties should be allowed instead. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Best Buy Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In Re Republic Western Insurance Co. Insurance Coverage LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2002
  3. In Re Glaceau Vitaminwater Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  4. In Re Glaceau Vitaminwater Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API