Legal Opinion

Gordon, Huffaker & Garnett v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 13, 1920PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Motion to Dissolve Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Justice Carroll —

Dissolving injunction.

This case, presenting a very unusual state of fact as well as novel questions of law, comes before me on a motion to dissolve an injunction granted to tbe plaintiffs by the judge of the Franklin circuit court, in the suit of Robert G. Gordon, Hite Huffaker and James Garnett against Edwin P. Morrow, Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

The suit was brought' by the plaintiffs, who are attorneys at law, to restrain Governor Morrow from cancelling or attempting to cancel, by executive order or otherwise, a contract entered into on October…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Norman v. Kentucky Board of ManagersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. County of Harlan v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. White v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Talbott, Com'r of Finance v. Public Service Com'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Tracy v. MacIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API