Legal Opinion

Bochner v. Automatic Time Stamp Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Debt, on injunction bond. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for plaintiff. Error by plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

The failure to abstract the stipulation in'regard to solicitor’s fees is sufficient to justify us in affirming the judgment for want of a sufficient abstract of the record, but as defendant in error has not asked it, and the record is short, we have seen fit to consider the merits. Martin v. McMurray, 74 Ill. App. 44; City of Chicago v. Fitzgerald, 75 Id. 176; Arnold v. Gehring, 76 Id. 486; Gibler v. City of Mattoon, 167 Ill. 18.

Aside from injunctions enjoining judgments, the statute of this State (Hurd’s, Oh. 69, Sec. 9)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibler v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hibbard v. McKindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Barnes v. BrookmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. John F. Alles Plumbing Co. v. AllesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Martin & Co. v. McMurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silver v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API