Legal Opinion

Martin & Co. v. McMurray

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Trial Rights of Property.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henderson County; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bibell

Appellee has entered his motion to affirm the judgment for failure of appellant to furnish a complete abstract or abridgment of the record as required by Bule 20. Appellant has not asked leave to file an amended abstract, but files a brief in resistance of the motion. The abstract contains certain oral testimony and sets out only two rulings by the court, and no exceptions thereto. The rest of the abstract is a mere 'skeleton index of the record. There is nothing in the abstract except in the oral testimony to show what the case is about, and nothing to show whether there are in the case any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibler v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Strohm v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Chicago, Peoria & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amundson Printing Co. v. Empire Paper Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Mayer v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Carey v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  4. Grabill v. RenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Home Guardian of America v. HoltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API