Legal Opinion

Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, and as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Anni H. J. E. Oehmichen

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 29, 1957No. 13424_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellee Anni H. J. E. Oehmichen, widow of Erhard M. Oehmichen, brought a civil action against the Attorney General under the Trading with the Enemy Act1 to establish her right in certain property vested by the Alien Property Custodian in 1947, 1950 and 1951. The property consisted of checking accounts in Chicago and Newark banks, shares of stock in a corporation formerly controlled by Mr. Oehmichen, and a claim against that corporation. After trial the District Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered a judgment directing the Attorney General to *638…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Acheson v. MurakamiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Kaku Nagano v. McGrath Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Yaichiro Akata v. BrownellDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marie Louise Willenbrock v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, and as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Anni H. J. E. OehmichenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Sumiye Umeki Yamauchi v. RogersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API