Legal Opinion
Kaku Nagano v. McGrath Atty. Gen
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 4, 1951No. 10192_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
The District Court having allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff appeals. Consequently, our only question is whether, by the averments of the complaint, a good and sufficient cause of action was presented.
The averments are in substance as follows: Plaintiff, a native of Japan, is a permanent resident of the United States, and has resided within this country for a period in excess of seven consecutive years following 1915, when she first entered, and has never relinquished that residence. She is married to Shinsaku Nagano, likewise a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Russian Volunteer Fleet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Marie Louise Willenbrock v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Yaichiro Akata v. BrownellDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1954
- Guessefeldt v. McGrath as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.