Legal Opinion

Ford v. Ford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1887No. 11,774PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From’the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was a proceeding for the establishment of a drain. It was commenced by petition to the board of commissioners of Kosciusko county, at its June session in 1882. Viewers were appointed, and after their report was filed notices of the pendency of the petition, and of the time set for the hearing thereof, were posted by the county auditor. At the time appointed for the hearing, the appellant, Cal-lender Ford, appeared and filed a remonstrance, assigning ten specific causes of objection. Of these the sixth and seventh were respectively:

That there had been no notice given by the auditor of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Schmied v. KeeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Neff v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sunier v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Scott v. BrackettIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gilbert v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Zigler v. MengesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API