Legal Opinion

People v. Vasquez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2010No. B218802PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

As part of the resolution of a criminal case charging him with two felony counts of failure to control a mischievous animal that caused serious bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 399, subd. (b)),1 Orlando Vasquez agreed to pay $168,633.20 in restitution to Heiddy G., a young girl who had been severely mauled by his pit bull. Vasquez subsequently moved to have the court declare his restitution obligation satisfied, contending a $300,000 payment to settle a civil suit against Vasquez and his landlord, funded by the landlord’s insurer through a homeowners policy that also insured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. Grundfor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Walker v. Appellate Div. of the Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Barickman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. In re Chauncey M. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API