Legal Opinion

Minton v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1926No. 16547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The defendant in error, L. F. Roberts, was plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error, L. E. Minton, Lucy N. Button, Carrie C. Hewitt, and C. D. Nellis, were defendants, in the trial court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

This suit involves the title to certain described lots in the city of Pawhuska. The property involved in this action, and other property, was involved in the suit of Minton v. Button et al., which suit was tried in the district court of Osage county during the year 1922, and was appealed to this court Dy the defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Baker v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Nellis v. MintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hess v. VossIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gragg v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Wolfe v. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Harrison v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Thomas v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API