Legal Opinion

People v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress identification testimony is lacking in merit. Although evidence of the station house showup should have been suppressed (see, People v Riley, 70 NY2d 523, 530; People v Straughter, 152 AD2d 919), the suppression court properly found that there was an independent source for the identification because the witness, who was suspicious of defendant, was able to observe him carefully for 15 to 20 minutes prior to the crime (see, Manson v Brathwaite, 432 US 98, 110; People v…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. NeverettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API