Legal Opinion

People v. Neverett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly determined that, although the victim’s identification of defendant at a station-house showup was unreliable (see, People v Riley, 70 NY2d 523), the victim had an independent basis to support his in-court identification at trial (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600; People v Turner [appeal No. 1], 154 AD2d 885). The proof was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of attempted first degree robbery based on defendant’s use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument (see, Penal Law §§110.00,160.15 [3]). The victim testified that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API