Lyberg v. Northern Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Hicks, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. *
1Opinion of the CourtDicicinson, J.
The plaintiff was engaged in the service of the defendant in its shops as a blacksmith. In April, one Allen was assigned by the defendant as an assistant or “helper,” to work with the plaintiff. In this position it was Allen’s duty, among other things, to use a sledge while assisting the plaintiff in his work at the anvil. Allen was found to be incompetent, and for that reason an unsafe fellow-laborer, and the plaintiff gave notice of this to the foreman having general charge of this department, soon after which Allen was removed, and another assistant was put in his place. On the 4th day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greene v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Rothenberger v. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Antletz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Vogt v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Brown v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.