Dempster v. Fite
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
There can be no question that the evidence was abundant to have been submitted to the jury on the question o£ negligence and damage. In fact, there are no exceptions or assignments of error as to the charge of the court below in defendant’s brief. Part Rule 28 (200 N. C., at p. 831), is as follows: “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned by him.”
Plaintiff testified that on 4 July, 1930, she had received an injury in an automobile collision and that her pelvic bones had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Shaw v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Hill v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Riggs v. Norfolk-Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Patrick v. . TreadwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . DavidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Keith v. GreggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Virginia Beach Bus Line v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.