Legal Opinion
Bucho Holding Co. v. Temporary Housing Rent Commision
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1962PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
Upon direct appeals from Special Term orders dismissing the complaints of the three appellants, we are called upon to consider the constitutionality of section 4 of the Emergency Housing Kent Control Law as amended in 1962 (§ 4, subd. [a], as amd. by L. 1962, ch. 21, § 4).1 In essence, and insofar as applicable, it provides that the value of rent-controlled residential property, on which the landlord is entitled to a 6% return, is to be fixed by applying 1954 equalization rates to the current assessed valuation of such property.2 The challenged provision revokes the 1961 amendment which had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kalikow 78/79 Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- J.R.D. Management Corp. v. EimickeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- City of New York v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.