Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Bramlett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Howell County Circuit Court, J. R. Wool side, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note against the defendants as joint makers. Bramlett made no answer, and there was a judgment by default as against him. Maxey answered, setting up that he was a surety on the note; that as such surety, he did, ‘ ‘ on the third day of January, 1885, and after an action had accrued on said note, require the plaintiff, in writing, forthwith to commence suit against the principal debtor, Bramlett, which said notice was duly received by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff failed, refused, and neglected,” so to bring suit within the time so required by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hough v. GrayNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Perry v. BarretSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amick v. BaughWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Baskin v. CrewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Cox v. JeffriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API