Legal Opinion
Amick v. Baugh
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1965No. 37423PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
Defendants appeal from a summary judgment of the trial court entered on October 11, 1963. No material facts are in dispute.
Affidavits of both parties agree as to the following facts: On October 13, 1960, Thomas E. Dunstan, as maker, executed and delivered to respondent husband a promissory note for $5,000 payable to him. The note was also signed by appellant L. M. Baugh “as guarantor only.” On November 8, 1960, a similar note for $10,000 was also executed and delivered by Thomas E. Dunstan, as maker, and was signed by appellant L. M. Baugh (guarantor).
On November 5, 1962, respondents, Earl…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robey v. Walton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Farmers State Bank of Newport v. LamonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Newcomb v. . HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ganado Land Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Sample v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Don L. Tullis & Associates, Inc. v. GoverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Arnes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Allied Stores Corp. v. North West BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.