Legal Opinion
SMART SMR OF NY v. Zoning Com'n of Town of Stratford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 17, 1998No. 3:97 CV 1292(GLG)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, plaintiff Smart SMR of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications, (“Nextel”) moves for summary judgment on all counts of its complaint. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion.(Document # 8) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
BACKGROUND.
Nextel has been authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to construct and operate a digital mobile radio system in Connecticut in order to provide wide-area digital specialized mobile radio services (“SMR Services”). Nextel commenced this action after the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Town of LaGrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Apt Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township Butler County Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.