Legal Opinion

Chansky v. City of Haverhill

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 10, 2015Published

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The defendant, city of Haverhill (“City”), appeals from the trial court’s decisions granting the plaintiff, Daniel Chansky (“Chansky”), summary judgment awarding damages and declaratory judgment.

1. Factual background. Chansky owns land in Haverhill on Wingate Street (“the Property”). It is near land owned by the City on Granite Street. The City has built a parking garage on its land. Before the City acquired its land, it had been used by businesses that provided automobile repair services for many years. Years before this dispute, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Citation Insurance v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Affiliated FM Insurance v. Constitution Reinsurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Mathers v. Midland-Ross Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API