Mathers v. Midland-Ross Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment for the defendant Midland-Ross Corporation (Midland) ordered by a judge in the Superior Court. The plaintiff Joseph Mathers’ claims are based on product liability theories. 3 The plaintiffs allege in their unverified complaint that the “Midland Ross Corporation ... is the manufacturer of the machine which injured Joseph Mathers.” The defendant denies it manufactured the machine on which the injury occurred. After the allowance of Midland’s motion for summary judgment, and entry of a judgment for Midland, the plaintiffs appealed. We transferred the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Godbout v. CousensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Smith v. Ariens Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Donna Mack v. Cape Elizabeth School BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Wheatley v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Rafferty v. Merck & Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Welch v. Keene Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Garcia v. Kusan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.