Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Bonacker & Leigh

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 7, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-D-1318-NPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendant Bonaeker & Leigh’s (“Leigh”) “Motion to Vacate Entry of Default and For Leave to File an Answer” filed on February 5, 1997. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the caselaw and the record as a whole, the court finds that the Leigh’s motion is due to be denied.

Background

Plaintiff Carol Heaton (“Heaton”), acting as her own attorney, filed her complaint alleging sex and age discrimination on August 23, 1996. On August 26, 1996, the Clerk of the Middle District signed and mailed a summons to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Peter Gerard Wahl v. William McIverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Compania Interamericana Export-Import, S.A. v. Compania Dominicana De AviacionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Brian D. Hammer, Debtor. Brian D. Hammer v. Michael Drago and Ed SummersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
  2. Alejo Santos Rivera and Evelisse I. Pinero Roldan v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Credito Roosevelt Roads, et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API