In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Windsor
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The accused has been found by the Oregon State Bar Trial Committee and by the Board of Governors to be guilty of commingling funds belonging to certain clients with his own money in violation of Rule 9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
We have examined the transcript of testimony, and the numerous exhibits, and are convinced that the accused did commingle certain money that did not belong to him with his own personal funds. Such misconduct is ordinarily ground for disbarment. In re Otto W. Heider, 217 Or 134, 341 P2d 1107.
The misconduct in this case was the product of a complicated program…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- In re Complaint as to the Conduct of WindsorOregon Supreme Court · 1964