Northeastern Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Hepburn
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a final decree of tire former chancellor, advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 72 N. J. Eq. (2 Buck.) 7.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellor.
These three cases are identical in their circumstances, were heard together in the court of chancery, and argued together before this court. In each case a temporary injunction was granted by the court below, and by the final decree this injunction was made .permanent, and the defendants were thereby perpetually enjoined from interfering with the complainant in the erection, construction, maintenance and operation of a certain line of telephone poles, or with any cross-arms that had been or might be placed upon the poles, or with any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Jefferson v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Taylor v. LowencampNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Joachim v. BelfusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Lee v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore LinesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.