Legal Opinion

State v. McCotter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1974No. 743SC657PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s first assginment of error presents the question of whether a defendant who was never arraigned and entered no plea at trial is entitled to a new trial. Defendant relies on State v. Lueders, 214 N.C. 558, 200 S.E. 22 (1938), where a unanimous Court, speaking through Chief Justice Stacy, said:

"... In the absence of a plea to the indictment or charge, there was nothing for the jury to determine. See S. v. Camby, 209 N.C., 50, 182 S.E., 715. *77Speaking to a similar situation in S. v. Cunningham, 94 N.C., 824, Ashe, J., delivering the opinion of the Court, said: ‘There is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McCotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API