Legal Opinion

Stowell v. R.L.K. & Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1984No. A8202-00608; CA A26586; A8202-00609; CA A26587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

These consolidated cases involve similar actions for “conversion” and “interference.” Plaintiffs’ complaints allege that defendants, who operate the Timberline Lodge ski resort, sold plaintiffs passes that entitled them to daily ski lift tickets. The complaints then allege that defendants refused to issue the lift tickets. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that a previous action between the parties was res judicata. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment for defendants. We decide that defendants are not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bolte v. Aits, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bentley v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wilson v. Western Alliance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. StanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Allison v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Federal Recovery of Washington, Inc. v. WingfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API