Legal Opinion

Continental Distilling Corp. v. Humphrey

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 4437-52PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEECH, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, to declare invalid and restrain enforcement of a ruling by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, pursuant to authority of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 49 Stat. 977, as amended, 27 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. (1952), that certain whisky marketed by the plaintiff, Continental Distilling Corporation, should be labeled to show that it had been stored in reused cooperage, in conformity with Section 39(a) of Regulations No. 5, adopted March 2, 1938, 3 Fed.Reg. 486, 27 CFR…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. KrulewitchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  2. American Nat. Red Cross v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  3. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Liquid Nitrogen Processing Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  4. EW Bliss Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961
  5. Ostow & Jacobs, Inc. v. Morgan-Jones, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API