Legal Opinion
Sutton v. Napolitano
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 15, 2013No. 13-cv-173-wmcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher Sutton seeks a writ of mandamus under the Mandamus and Venue Act (“MVA”) or an order under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) that would compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to (1) respond to an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and (2) rule on his 1-130 petition for his spouse’s permanent residency. He also challenges the constitutionality of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (“AWA”) as applied to him. Defendants have filed various motions under Rule…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bodo v. CioppaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Russell, Matthew v. Blinken, AntonyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Shamim v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025