State v. Barbour
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is the defendant’s sole assignment of error: the Court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the punishment per-, mitted by G.S. 14-33.
However, at the threshold of our consideration of this appeal we are confronted with the acts of the Court, upon the defendant’s plea of nolo contendere, in finding the defendant guilty of a part of the offenses charged, and not guilty of another part, and in imposing judgment “on the verdict.”
In this jurisdiction pleas of nolo contendere have been accepted for many years. The acceptance by the Court of such a plea, and its entry in the Minutes of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Commonwealth v. IngersollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SwinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- North Carolina State Bar v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. MunschSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.