Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Magne-Silica Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1910No. Civ. No. 824Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order denying a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

The action was one to recover damages on account of personal injuries. Trial was had before a jury, verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from the judgment and an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.

The contention of appellant that there is no evidence tending to show neglect on the part of defendant or its officers, if determined adversely to appellant, disposes of the questions involved in the motion for a nonsuit, as well as the other specifications of error presented.

We find evidence in the record tending to show that defendant was engaged in operating a mine from which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ingerman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jenson v. Will & Finck Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Quinn v. Electric Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Forsman v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API