Legal Opinion

Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1940No. M-152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The plaintiff in its amended petition alleges in the first count thereof that in or about the month of May 1926 the defendant, acting through the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, promised and agreed to pay the plaintiff the sum of $128,244.72 as a balance overpaid on its tax liability for the year 1917. Of this amount, the sum of $39,449.48 was credited to an additional tax for 1920 and $662.63 was credited to an additional tax for 1922, but no part of the balance of $88,132.61 has been paid to the plaintiff.

In the second count it is alleged that about January 22, 1925, and September 5,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Zachary v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
  3. Baumgard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API