Legal Opinion
Brooks v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided May 28, 1992No. 01-91-00909-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRICE, Justice (Assigned).
On October 7, 1991, after the trial court denied his motion to suppress, appellant pled no contest and was found guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Punishment, once enhanced, was assessed at eight years confinement. Appellant gave timely written notice of appeal. In two points of error, appellant challenges the denial of the motion to suppress and the legality of his conviction based upon evidence obtained by virtue of an illegal detention and search.
At 2:49 a.m. on February 22, 1991, Officer Nasworthy was responding to a burglary-in-progress call…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hoag v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Crockett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State of Texas v. Mazuca, AlvaroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Fletcher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Cooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.