Legal Opinion
People v. Hardin
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 1983No. Docket Nos. 6330, 6331PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, J.
Defendant admits to being an ostensible seller of methamphetamine. In making his sale to a deputy sheriff he assured his buyer that for the $120 price paid the effect on the buyer would be highly satisfactory. In fact, the sheriff recalled the assurances to be: “[I]t would knock your socks off, or knock your head off . . . .’’In reality the substance sold included only a small amount of methamphetamine.
On this appeal from his conviction after jury trial, defendant urges “the prosecution must show that the methamphetamine in question was of sufficient quantity so as to have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Addison v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. BusbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. DiamondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. MataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.