Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 25, 1951No. 35,444PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
Richard J. Thomas and Esther G. Thomas, his wife, instituted proceedings in the district court of St. Louis county to restrain the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, Minnesota, and the city of Duluth from proceeding with a program of action intended to culminate in the establishment of a low-rent housing development at Duluth in conformity with .federal and state law.
The facts, as stipulated between the parties, are undisputed. The issues raised by the pleadings are as to the law only, and particularly the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Ferch v. Housing Authority of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Thill v. Modern Erecting CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.