Legal Opinion

Roth v. Continental Wire Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Franklin Ferris, Judge. (1) The referee erred in excluding evidence offered to show that Charles A. Roth paid nothing for the assignments of claims sued on, and was not the real party in interest, and the court erred in adopting his rulings.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Franklin Ferris, Judge. (1) The referee erred in excluding evidence offered to show that Charles A. Roth paid nothing for the assignments of claims sued on, and was not the real party in interest, and the court erred in adopting his rulings. Nanson v. Jacob, 93 Mo. 331; Williams v. Whitlock, 14 Mo. 553; R. S. 1889, ■sec. 1990; R. S. 1899, soc. 540; Wonderly v. Lafayette Co., 150 Mo. 635; Roberts v. Abner, 42 S. W. 337; Perry v. Liter, 37 Mo. 274; Bidwell v. Dock Co., 40 Mo. 42; Bigler v. Eliekinger, 55 Pa. St. 284; Kollock v. Gunnert, 43 Mo.…

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

On September 1, 1896, the B. Roth Tool Company, a corporation doing business in the city of St." Louis, and the Continental Wire Company, a corporation doing -business in Granite City, in the State of Illinois, entered' .into the following contract:

*240“St. Louis, Mo., Sept. 1, 1896.
“Eor and in consideration of the sum of fifty dollars,, to it in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and the further consideration of the agreements hereinafter stated, the B. Roth Tool Company hereby sells to the-Continental Wire Company the option to purchase twenty-five wire-nail machines…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Utley v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Caruth-Byrnes Hardware Co. v. WolterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, a Corporation v. Norris Grain Company, a Tennessee Corporation, and Norris Grain Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. May Oil Burner Corp. v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Baltimore MacHine & Equipment, Inc. v. Holtite Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API