Legal Opinion
Linsley v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1999No. B121382PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*764Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, Scott Linsley, appeals from a judgment awarding attorney fees pursuant to Government Code1 section 12965, subdivision (b) to defendants, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (Fox), John Suciu, and Gloria Dickey, as the prevailing parties on a claim for unlawful discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (§ 12900 et seq.) Plaintiff, who signed a release of all claims in exchange for the payment of money prior to the filing of the present lawsuit, contends the trial court erred because there has never been a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Akers v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rosenman v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rosenfeld v. Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.