Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Rogers

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The attack on the first cause of action is upon the ground that plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue. In considering this question it is necessary to briefly analyze the history of this estate.

Hosea Rogers died on December 14, 1904, leaving a last will and testament dated November 20, 1901. His heirs and next of kin were Asenath Rogers, his widow, and five children, including a son, William H. Rogers. The will was offered for probate on January 3, 1905, and objections were filed by the son William. Thereafter Polly M. Rogers, a daughter, was appointed temporary administratrix of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In Re the Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Meeker v. . DraffenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. In Re the Will of KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. In re the Estate of LakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trowbridge v. First-Stamford National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Erny TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Rogers v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Matheson v. American Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. In re the Accounting of Hanover BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API