Legal Opinion

In re Poveromo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-400, concluding that JOSEPH E. POVEROMO of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded based on his conviction of the fourth-degree crime of contempt, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-9b, conduct in violation of RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on an attorney’s fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH E. POVEROMO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further;

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re PoveromoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API