In re Poveromo

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1989. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted to practice in 1988. He is currently suspended from practice in New Jersey (see In re Poveromo, 178 NJ 262, 839 A2d 849 [2003]; In re Poveromo, 176 NJ 508, 825 A2d 1137 [2003]).

Respondent has not answered or otherwise replied to a petition of charges or to petitioner’s subsequent motion for a default *735judgment, both of which were served on him by mail at his last known address in New Jersey. Under the circumstances, respondent is deemed to have…