Legal Opinion

Amstar Corporation v. Envirotech Corporation and Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 27, 1984No. Appeal 83-1090PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1478MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from that part of a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah finding non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,523,889 (’889 patent). We reverse and remand.

Background

In January 1979, Amstar Corporation (Amstar) sued Envirotech Corporation (Envirotech) and Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc. (EFN), charging infringement of process and apparatus claims 1 through 10 of the ’889 patent, active inducement of others to infringe, and contributory infringement. Envirotech and EFN asserted defenses of non-infringement, invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
D.M.I., Inc. v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.