Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 2010No. 39055-8-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, C.J.

¶1 Marjorie Arnold and her son Daniel1 appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and dismissing their asbestos-related claims.2 The Arnolds sued Lockheed after Reuben Arnold, Marjorie’s husband and Daniel’s father, died from mesothelioma. Together with Reuben’s claims stemming from his work as an insulator at Lockheed’s shipyard, the Arnolds asserted injuries from “take home exposure” — i.e. exposure to asbestos that Reuben brought home on his clothing. Additionally, Daniel asserted a primary exposure claim against Lockheed based on his work as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Aba Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. CANO-GARCIA v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Cano-Garcia v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Hymas v. UAP Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API