Legal Opinion
Dean v. Specialized Security Response
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-515PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTI, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion for a new trial (ECF No. 104) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a). Andrew Dean (“Dean” or “plaintiff’), an African-American former security guard, commenced this action against his former employer, Specialized Security Response, Inc. (“Specialized” or “defendant”), by filing a complaint with this court on April 28, 2009. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs complaint included the following claims: (1) race discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (2) retaliatory…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Ft. Lauderdale v. Mechel OaoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Acosta v. Fairmount Foundry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Azer Scientific Incorporated v. Quidel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Baet Ruano v. MeiburgerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.